All insights Legal design · Comparative law

Two Ways of Seeing a Contract

Civil law reads the code; common law reads the bargain. The same clause can carry different weight on each side of the seam — visualised.

Răzvan Alexandru Olaru5 June 20267 min read

Hand the same contract to a Bucharest judge and a London judge and they will not read it the same way. Not because one is stricter than the other, but because they are looking for different things.

Civil law begins with the Code: a written, systematic statement of the rules, which the judge applies to the facts. Common law begins with the decided case: the law is what courts have worked out, dispute by dispute, and the judge adds to it. Two different instincts about where law lives — and they shape every contract that crosses between them.

CIVIL LAW · ROMANIACOMMON LAW · E&WPrimary sourceThe Code — written & systematicPrecedent — decided casesThe judgeApplies the Code to the factsMakes law as cases are decidedReading itPurpose, cause & good faithThe words & the bargain struckFilling gapsThe Code supplies defaultsImplied terms & trade customGood faithA general, overriding dutyNo general duty (only in places)The documentLeaner — the Code fills inLong — it must say everything
How the two traditions approach the same agreement. Generalised — every system has its exceptions.

The same clause, two readings

Take a single idea — good faith — and watch it change weight as it crosses the seam. A clause that leans on the parties’ good-faith cooperation is load-bearing in Romania and comparatively thin in England.

Civil law reads

A general duty to perform honestly and loyally runs through the whole contract. The court can use it to fill silences, and in places even to temper a term that operates harshly. Good faith does real work.

Common law reads

There is no general duty of good faith. The parties are largely held to the words they chose. Cooperation must usually be written in as a specific obligation, or it cannot be relied on.

Why it matters at the seam

A contract drafted for one tradition can quietly underperform in the other. An English-style agreement — long, exhaustive, written to stand on its own — may include more than a Romanian court needs and yet still miss a protection the Code would otherwise have supplied. A leaner Romanian-style contract, dropped in front of an English court, may find that the gaps it left for the Code to fill simply stay empty.

The drafting consequence

Write for the harder reader. Don’t assume the Code — or the court — will rescue an English-style contract in Romania, and don’t assume an English court will fill in a lean Romanian-style one. The craft of the seam is knowing precisely what each system will, and won’t, supply for you.

This is general comparative information, not legal advice, and does not create a lawyer–client relationship. The contrasts above are deliberate simplifications; both traditions have important exceptions, and any specific clause needs advice on its own facts.

Drafting across the civil–common-law seam? Make sure the clause lands the same way on both sides.

Free brochure

The civil vs common-law drafting checklist

A one-page brief on this topic, sent straight to your inbox.

Facing this on a live document?

Book a 30-minute clinic

A quick read on your exact seam — by a lawyer qualified on both sides of it. No charge for the first look.

Your details go to Răzvan Alexandru Olaru (raz@olawru.com) and are held under a lawyer’s professional secrecy (Legea nr. 51/1995 & the Statutul profesiei de avocat) and the corresponding SRA confidentiality rules, processed in line with the GDPR. See our Privacy Policy and GDPR Statement.